Mac OS X issues for the Monk portion?
#2
Posted 18 September 2006 - 09:21 PM
#4
Posted 19 September 2006 - 10:48 AM
I can't generally afford to keep a monk off the frontlines until after I get Immy back, by which time it's generally not much of an issue.
#7
Posted 19 September 2006 - 07:11 PM
Lord_Jeremy, on Sep 19 2006, 03:02 PM, said:
Exactement, mon frère. And since I can only get my monk down to a crappy -3 in the early parts of chapter 2 I'm getting seriously abused by crappy things like kobold commandos en masse. A negative armor class should be a seriously wondrous thing, but low-level monsters can hit my monk fairly easily and generally do a lot of damage. My guy took over 50 points of damage when clearing out the sewers underneath the Copper Coronet when playing BP as the freaking commandos targeted him rather than my stone-skinned mage. That's just ludicrous, IMO. Makes it more important how many potions of extra healing the party carries than how well they're armored.
Against the trolls in De'Arnisse Keep I was popping two or three potions of extra healing every single encounter with more than one troll. Even when I managed to keep them out of the rear of the party my front-line tanks were getting seriously abused at -3 and -4 by the trolls. I mean when they average about 20 points of damage per hit against good combinations of armor and protective magic and they manage 2-3 hits against those ACs before dying against my level 9 fighter types...
But maybe that's just my own sense of how things are off-balance in D&D nowadays. But I don't recall these sorts of issues back in the days of yore when I played P'n'P. I mean I go back to the days of the three rule books and the various supplements like Blackmoor and all that. [/rant]
I know that this will never be implemented as it doesn't fit any of the published versions of the monk, but I'd prefer to see a system where he starts off with a better AC, but is slower to progress and tops out sooner.
#8
Posted 20 September 2006 - 01:43 AM
#9
Posted 20 September 2006 - 06:05 AM
NiGHTMARE, on Sep 20 2006, 01:48 AM, said:
Unless the Mac version changed this, or something.
[fires up BG and loads a saved game] I'll be damned, you can. I guess that I never noticed because they don't do anything for the monk if their AC is higher than the monk's. I guess that I focused on the fact that the AC didn't change rather than if they were greyed out.
#10
Posted 25 September 2006 - 09:06 AM
sturmvogel, on Sep 19 2006, 08:53 PM, said:
Hmm, I wonder if simply commenting out / deleting the 'bgmain' & 'mfist*' related .tp2 sections would allow installation... If not, maybe for a future version you could split monk remix into subcomponents, so that if bgmain.exe is detected it will ask whether to install the 'full remix', and if it is not detected it moves on to the 'fist-less limited remix'?
#11
Posted 07 October 2006 - 07:59 AM
Section I from: 005C5F00 to 005C5F40 in ASCII: &MFIST1.&MFIST2.&MFIST3.&MFIST4.&MFIST5.&MFIST6.&MFIST7.&MFIST8. in hex: 26 4D 46 49 53 54 31 01 26 4D 46 49 53 54 32 01 26 4D 46 49 53 54 33 01 26 4D 46 49 53 54 34 01 26 4D 46 49 53 54 35 01 26 4D 46 49 53 54 36 01 26 4D 46 49 53 54 37 01 26 4D 46 49 53 54 38 01 Section II: from: 00B9B0E4 to 00B9B124 in ASCII: &MFIST1.&MFIST2.&MFIST3.&MFIST4.&MFIST5.&MFIST6.&MFIST7.&MFIST8. in hex: 26 4D 46 49 53 54 31 01 26 4D 46 49 53 54 32 01 26 4D 46 49 53 54 33 01 26 4D 46 49 53 54 34 01 26 4D 46 49 53 54 35 01 26 4D 46 49 53 54 36 01 26 4D 46 49 53 54 37 01 26 4D 46 49 53 54 38 01
I'm guessing that at least the MFIST "numbers" (31-38 currently) are to be changed. As hex editing via WeiDU confuses me, what do the equivalent sections of bgmain.exe look like when Monk Remix is done with them?
With luck, simply using different address specifics would make this work. There would be one caveat: the end user would be well advised to make a backup of the BG2 executable before installing, as the backup WeiDU makes is useless - it doesn't back up the resource fork, making the application an ornament. Thus it would probably be best to run the hex patching as a shell script on the Mac side .
Edited by Gorilym, 07 October 2006 - 08:00 AM.
#13
Posted 08 October 2006 - 10:50 AM
#14
Posted 08 October 2006 - 02:38 PM
CamDawg, on Oct 8 2006, 08:55 PM, said:
OK, that's something to keep in mind at least. I'll have a look at that kit.
#15
Posted 13 July 2009 - 04:29 PM
If someone from Mac- or Linux- Land can recheck using v4, it would be cool if we could make sure Mac folks are actually able to use this correctly
Reply to this topic

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users











